johnnevillecolumn.jpg (12190 bytes)

Diet is so important for fish

Few, if any, species of animals are affected so greatly by the availability or non-availability of food as fish.
If we ignore freaks among the human race a man weighing six stone is considered quite small and at anything over twenty odd stones he is considered a giant.
It’s not like that where fish are concerned because they put on weight, or fail to do so, according to the amount of food that is available to them in their particular environment, food that can be obtained without the expenditure of much effort.
An example of this is the weights being achieved now by pike living in trout waters and the way that short-lived trout can be scooped up dead.
The greatest example of this rapid growth of stunted fish is seen where trout are concerned.
I often fished as a boy in a tiny stream, a tributary of a tributary of a smallish river on the outskirts of Sheffield where each tiny pool contained wild brown trout.
The biggest trout I ever saw there was about eight inches long but the average size of the Lilliputian trout was five or six inches at most.
Compare this with brown trout in certain big lochs in Scotland, the so-called “ferox” trout, that grow to well over the 20lb mark.
Of course carp grow very quickly when fed lots of calorie-filled protein baits thrown is as free offerings.
This has resulted in lots of freak fish that have such distened bellies that they weigh a lot more than any normal carp does.
It will not please some carp fishing addicts when I say that these ugly fish fill me with contempt rather than admiration.

Previous John Neville Stories