
Ladies and Gentleman the Winner is -
Carbon Fibre!
Ok, a strange way to start an article but after the
amount of thought I've given to a certain topic over the last month
I needed to say it out loud - or my head was likely to explode. It
had all started innocently enough during a post fishing, or shall
we say, liquid discussion with my three friends PF1, 2 and 3.
PF3, from nowhere, posed the question 'What is the single most important
technological advance that has ever happened in angling?' We mocked
at first, conversation between us is rarely this sophisticated and
PF3 is not usually noted for his intelligence. I site as an example
an occasion when I had spilled about half a pint of maggots in my
garage. He turned up whilst I was trying to sweep them up, took one
look and asked if after our last session, I had 'dropped a pregnant
one?' I sat him down and patiently explained that usually when there
is a mummy fly and a daddy fly, that love each other very much...
the look of shame on his face when he realised what a dumb thing he
had said was priceless.
Best technical advance though, this level of intelligent conversation
was indeed new territory for PF3, and we all decided, on balance,
that as he may never achieve such lofty heights again we should give
it our best attention.
After much gnashing of teeth PF1 came up with monofilament line, PF2,
the fixed spool reel and PF3, returning to usual form offered 'the
method'. Cue much laughter and derision as we attempted to point out
to PF3 that the method was simply a new way of tying things up that
already existed and so technically didn't count. PF3 was decidedly
crestfallen and looked as disappointed as a French angler who has
just discovered for the first time he was not allowed to eat the contents
of his keepnet. I instantly went for carbon fibre and stated that
I was right and, as usual, they were all stupid.
Before
I go on, I should explain about PF1, 2 and 3. These guys have been
my friends, and fishing partners for many, many years and as men they
are a fantastic bunch, as friends they are without parallel, but,
as anglers? Lets just say they are to angling what Dick Clegg is to
diplomacy. Despite my best efforts they are so woefully bad that they
have been deemed not worthy of names and have been re-christened,
by me I should add, as 'Pools Fodder'.
1, 2 and 3. Don't feel sorry for them, it's a title that they are
all comfortable with, particularly PF3. He takes some perverse satisfaction
from the fact that after years of regular sweeps, he has never beaten
me. Ever. He has stated for the record, that if some strange planetary
alignment takes place, or I perhaps lose an arm in a random threshing
accident and he actually manages to win, even just once, he'll streak
naked round Leicester town centre with the butt section of my Spectron
on his manhood. Trust me on this, if it ever happens it's a sight
worth seeing, PF3 weighs about 17 stone and has the aerodynamics of
a cooker.
Once, we all deliberately fished the first half of a session with
no bait on the hook and let him surge ahead, his face was a picture
as we all assured him we would hold him to his pledge. It looked to
be on on the cards with ten minutes to go, but I fluked a carp (hooked
in a fin) and did him, and the citizens of Leicester, a massive favour
by beating him by no more than a couple of ounces.
PF1 and 2 are a little better, and, when they can stay untangled and
sober, they do manage a very, very odd win, but, overall it has to
be said that they have proved to be as reliable a source of income
for me as a bung to a football manager. It has never ceased to amaze
me how my friends continue to turn up, month in, month out, and line
up to give me a tenner each. One year I saved up all that I had won
and bought a new front fence, complete with a pair of shiny new wrought
iron gates. I called it my 'Fodder Fence', PF2 was so disgusted by
the name he threatened to knock it over, and then reverse over the
debris, repeatedly, in a stolen car before calling the police and
blaming me. But anyway, more about those unfortunates in later articles.
Instantly ditching PF3s suggestion of 'The Method' left us with three
candidates and they are all worthy of deeper consideration having
all contributed, in varying degrees, to the betterment of angling.
Monofilament, for example, was a huge step forward from catgut which,
despite its name, was made from stretched bits of sheep and cow intestines.
It was fished by attaching short hook lengths to a much longer length
of flax and from what I've heard and read, it was as unreliable as
a Blair manifesto. At the tender age of 43 I have never had the pleasure
of fishing with it, but according to our angling fore-fathers it was
thick, non-flexible and had a wet not strength akin to a piece of
cooked spaghetti. Catgut knots were prone to slipping under pressure
and what they needed was a blob of superglue, but sadly, the venerable
Isaac Walton missed the opportunity to glue his fingers to his eyelids
with this foul substance by many years.
Monofilament
was actually invented in the 1930s but the British cow population
couldn't breath a sigh of relief until it was popularised in angling
in the 50s, and there is little doubt it has contributed hugely to
an anglers ability both to get bites and to land fish.
Which is more interesting,
monofilament or this clothes peg?
But, from where I sit it has a major problem in context to this debate
that means it must be dismissed. You see no matter how hard you try,
and after years of further development you can't get away from this
fact, it is still the weakest link in any anglers set up. I've no
doubt that small pale skinned men in white coats and thick national
health glasses have sweated long and hard over this problem, but still,
if you lose a fish then probably its because the line broke, frayed,
tangled or the knot slipped, hardly the stuff of technological excellence.
What I really want from mono to make it truly great, is that it is
as thin as spider silk, invisible to the naked eye and has the strength
to support Bernard Manning from a gallows, yet, after decades of development
we are still a long way away from that scenario.
Reels,
beautifully engineered, but as vindictive as a scorpion in your pants
The fixed spool reel is a similar conundrum. They have been around
in some form or other for centuries with the earliest known depictions
in Chinese paintings from around the 1200's so you would think that
by now the pasty-faced lab coat brigade would have got them sorted
as well.
Its undeniable that modern open-faced reels are indeed superb bits
of engineering and some like the Mitchell Match and Shimano Bait Runner
have justifiably reached legendary status.
Relentless years of design and development mean some reels can now
throw several ounces of lead almost across the channel, others have
more ball bearings than an F1 Ferrari and some cost so much you could
change your mind on a whim and buy a small Scottish island. And get
change. Others have gearing and slipping clutch systems so sophisticated
you can land big, heavy, hard fighting carp simply by gently turning
the handle whilst at the same time sipping tea from a china cup.
But, and here's the rub, take your eyes off a reel, and I mean any
reel, no matter how many islands its worth, for one second and the
vicious swine will leap up at you in a devastating over-run and leave
you with something resembling Jeremy Clarkson's hair wedged in the
butt ring. As a result of this violent jam the other end stops dead
in the air, twangs backwards on the tip and repeats the process round
the base of the float. Marvellous, complete devastation and a total
re-tackle, and usually at a vital point in a match. And when its raining.
And when someone's watching. Again, a bit of extra work needed on
that idea then chaps.
Carbon Fibre...
So that leaves us with carbon fibre. Of the items mentioned so far
it has the shortest history, only really breaking through into angling
in the 70's and 80's and yet, lets face it, thanks to more spotty,
socially isolated blokes in labs, its now pretty amazing stuff. I
could bore you with tales of the Sohio process that is somehow involved
in the forming of the carbon. Not to mention the baking of the resultant
product at 2500 degrees, at some point, before it becomes a usable
bit of kit, but really after a full two minutes research on the Internet
I had absolutely no idea what they were talking about, such is the
complexity of making the stuff.
What I do know though is without it we wouldn't have poles. Even low
priced poles are superb bits of kit, such is the quality of modern
carbon fibre. Most are now cigarette paper thin, weigh less than one
of Victoria Beckham's arms and could lift small wrecks from the sea
bed if required.
Shell out a bit of cash and the performance becomes nothing short
of remarkable. My present tool has taken some incredible punishment
and although it's a standard Spectron, which is essentially a match
pole, I've had carp to almost 20lbs on it, and it has never once got
out of shape or run out of power. But there's more. Far more important
than this indestructibility, and without even mentioning their ability
to target and catch fish, is that they are also very, very sexy.
In my NFA coaching role I work with a lot of lapsed anglers returning
to the sport, as well as new anglers, and during tackle introductions
they don't get excited about the latest hi-tech lines and the newest
shiny reels, Oh no. Get a pole out though, set it at it's full length
and place it in their hands and the look of astonishment on their
faces and the amount of drool collecting in the corners of their mouths
is amazing. It's like strapping a monkey into the space shuttle.
If, as an experienced angler you get the hang of smoothly flinging
a pole around with an air of mild disdain, like most of the top boys
do, you are admired from far and wide. I've had the privilege of being
slaughtered by Bob Nudd off the next peg after he fed all my fish
off me in the first two hours but it was totally ok, because even
a mildly portly and not very attractive Nudd has a pole in his hands
he looks as cool as a long green salad vegetable in shades who I could
watch all day.
So there you have it really, Carbon fibre has to be the clear winner.
Without it we wouldn't have the amazing poles we do. They are almost
indestructible, sexy as hell and more importantly as cool as it's
possible for fishing tackle to get, for once the back room boys got
it right, as have I, and I won't be argued with!
Dave Charlton
The Angry Angler
Opinionated? Me? Wanna argue about it?